A Nationalistic Pushback Against Globalism Should Not Stop There

 American Thinker has a new piece up from J.B. Shurk about how a nationalist revolution against globalism is brewing. He very correctly points out the gross hypocrisy of globalism, claiming to act in the name of democracy and free markets and western values while in fact being the embodiment of the opposite of those things. 

Globalism assures us that nationalism is evil. Nationalism assures us that globalism is evil. Both are correct. They each bring their own evils. But nationalism is at least a step closer to the least-evil system of governance: Localism. Localism as defined by deliberately structing government so that all authority is pushed down to the lowest level that can do it, which is mostly the city or county level regarding everything that affects our daily lives. Not that it is perfect, no system is- and that is why localism is the best we can hope for. Localism makes bad government both easier to change and easier to escape from if it won't change. Globalism makes both change and escape virtually impossible. Nationalism merely makes it very difficult. 

Only localism makes both change and escape as easy as possible without anarchy, which has its own evils. Localism is the closest we can come to subjecting government to the free market- which would force it to become true servants of decent citizens, or be swiftly punished by market forces. 

Get the books:

California Congressman Leaves Party to Run as Independent

  Rep. Kevin Kiley of California has announced that he will run for re-election as an independent, leaving the Republican Party behind. Redistricting means Kiley is facing a much more Democrat-leaning electorate. 

He makes the case I have been making for over a decade- that independents would answer only to their constituents rather than a party machine headquartered in DC. That said, successful politicians look out for their own careers first and foremost. He isn't running as an independent to make a statement. He is doing so because he feels it will give him the best chance to win. I consider that an encouraging sign. We'd be better off if most legislators were independents. When the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch are run by people in the same party, it is an informal end-run around the founder's formal system of checks and balances. 

Why Switzerland is so well run...

 

Localism over centraliztion, even for small nations. 

Could Cork be Independent? A Case of Localism

 

Is Western Canada Going its Own Way?

 

Is Greater Idaho Coming Soon?

Right out of Localism, a Philosophy of Government. Written in 2012 but more relevant today than the day the first copy was printed. 

Globalization Disproportionately benefits the Top 10% in Each Nation, Study Says

 This is my shocked face. 

May God Protect Us from the New Civil Religion

 

The War Among Supporters of Approval Voting / Star verses Ranked Choice or Instant Runoff Voting

 

Rasmussen Finds the "Elite 1% Driving the Culture War"

 Fascinating look at a small cross-section of Americans with influence all out of proportion to their numbers that have a view of life and government that is shockingly out of tune with their fellow countrymen. 

Council for Inclusive Capitalism: Straight From a Conspiracy Theorist's Version of a Bond Movie

 The organization, led by a Rothschild, seeks to formalize the replacement of elected leaders with a world in which the largest, most connected corporations make policy directly, with an AI they create as the new voice of authority! It is ESG on steroids.

Link to Amazon Page of "Localism, a philosophy of government". Do you have a philosophy of government that can resist globalism? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B0GACAQ

Critical Theory Has Turned on Its Creators. Behind Next Great Persecution of Jews?

 Critical Theory was developed by secular German Jews from the Frankfurt School who were shaped by the rise of Nazism. They wanted a new and comprehensive moral philosophy based on oppressor/oppressed dynamics and group identity. In other words, shaped by their experiences as a minority group that was oppressed. But the philosophy they developed is now backfiring and the left is startled to see that the same masses that buy into Critical Theory concepts are turning on the Jews. Why is this happening? It turns out that Critical Theory is a flawed Frankenstein's Monster, with the capacity to turn on its creators.

Link to book's Amazon Page Journey on the Outside, My Life as an Activist https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08VRF7G63 Localism, a Philosophy of Government https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B0GACAQ

Shocking Numbers in Both Parties Say Political Violence OK. Two-Party System Pushing America to War

 A recent poll has showed that significant numbers of Democrats and Trump Republicans consider political violence to be justified if necessary to stop the other side from implementing their agenda. Does the two-party system help drive the conclusion that violence is justified to stop "the other side"?

Localism, a philosophy of government Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B0GACAQ Journey on the Outside, My Life as an Activist Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08VRF7G63 FOR POLL, see page 12 of https://centerforpolitics.org/crystal...

Transcript

Elite Control Via Choice Management is Experiencing a System Failure in the Presidential Race

 

Get the books:

Why the Federal Reserve's Plans to put More Pain on Main Street Won't Stop Inflation

 

Get the books:

Why America Does NOT Have a "Two-tiered Justice System"

 

Get the books:

Sabotaging Instant-Runoff Voting (Ranked Choice Voting) With "All Hat Primaries"

Get the books:

 

Most Red States are not "Welfare Recipients" from Blue States

 When you look at this study, the numbers are surprisingly close. Take out west Mississippi and South Carolina and the "Red States" get out what they put in.  That is really surprising because FEDGOV runs a trillion dollar debt every year. You would think that the average state would be getting much more money from FEDGOV than its citizen's pay in, since so much spending is with borrowed money and not taxes. But FEDGOV is so spendthrift that they can borrow a trillion every year and the states don't really get more than they put in. On a per-capita GPD basis they do pretty well too considering that there are more retired people in red-states.

Big, empty states tend to do the worst. They are most dependent on federal funding. Overall though, it seems like FEDGOV is spending so much on empire that the states could do without them just fine. Not that I advocate that. FEDGOV could try ditching imperial ambitions and keeping the money home in order to foster national cohesiveness. 

Get the books:

Gaining Momentum: The Movement of Western Oregon Counties to Leave and Join Idaho

 This was something advocated in Localism, a Philosophy of Government. Written in 2012, it is more relevant today than it was the first day the ink dried. Counties should be able to change states if they feel like the state capital or the rest of the state does not share their values or is taking advantage of them. What is just, should they be forced to stay and be governed by the people in Eugene and Portland who look down on them? 

I was surprised that most counties in eastern Oregon had already had votes to leave...

Sinema Goes Independent

 Arizona Senator Sinema leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent. She is left, but has often served as a brake on the far-left elements of the Democratic party. Maybe if all members of the legislative branch were independents, they could represent their constituents and not a party HQ'd in DC and funded by global, not even American, money. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tired-partisanship-senator-kyrsten-sinema-abandons-dems-goes-independent